As students in High school or college we learned or the dire consequences of the 1920's of leverage buying of stocks on the assumption that the stocks could only go higher. Eventually it didn't go higher, and the value of stocks turned on a dime and retreated. It lead to a great depression of stock values that lasted for years. It is interesting that we can all look at that scenario today and ask how could it have ever happened? The stupid stock market! How could persons be so foolish to take such risk putting up a little money, and expecting such a big return. So what is different then about real estate flipping and investing? The problem is in perception...real estate is a different asset class that is viewed differently than stocks because it has land, it is tangible, and provides shelter. But the fundamentals of investment are not different. Whether or not we want to admit it, we have just lived through one of the greatest run ups in home buildings, and resales ever seen in the United States...and we are all hanging around to see when it will come back. Lets think of the national mindset we are in...
How could a buyer buy a home or real estate with little or nothing down, sell the home in a few months, make a profit and move on to the next deal? Is it really conceivable that this profit scenario would never end? This thinking works well on the upside, but no one is talking about what happens when a market flattens or worse yet, declines in value! What then? How does that impact real estate? It is one thing to ignore the events, but quite another to ignore the impact it will have. The impact is felt first in declining sales units, rising home inventory levels, longer days on market, a lowered List price / sales price ratio and eventually lowered sales prices. There is no way to peg a time-frame of events because there are so many variables. Local employment, absorption rates of competitive listings, and diminished sales. The impact moves beyond the individual into the neighborhood, and does not stop at the entrance of a subdivision. The effect goes far beyond...into falling local revenues, reassessments of property values etc...
The problem with looking at the big picture is that everyone tries to do it by looking at closed sales, or lagging statistics. Last months sales is not a way to determine where is this all going. It is sort of like driving a car using only the rear view mirror. It is not a totally good indicator of what is ahead. I think that the way this should be approached is with a mMore proactive approach. Realistic pricing is one way to do this, qualified buyers with 20% cash (Yes their own money in the deal), no drive by appraisals, oversight of the process, strong prosecution of fraud, and borrowers must have the ability to repay the loan they were given without any modification or refinance. Perhaps if we were acting like adults, things would never have gotten so crazy!.

Subscribe To Our Atlanta Real Estate Blog in a reader
Subscribe Now!
...with web-based news readers. Click your choice below:
RE/MAX Paramount Properties 678-595-5286 Direct
Or 888-940-0074 Toll Free Office
Atlanta Real Estate & Atlanta Homes for Sale





Ummm... I don't think they teach that anymore. Especially in high school. And probably not in College, except in business classes for MBAs. I was never even introduced to the idea of leverage until I started studying for Real Estate.
Plus, we are all told that we Deserve to have great experiences. As a birthright.
Jim, how do I follow that comment?
Real Estate is a special class of investment. It does allow leverage and it does go up indefinitely.
But with that said, the analyst needs to know how much the real growth is and not the "market value" which might be higher or lower than the "real" value at any given time. A buy and hold strategy in real estate almost always works.
Speculation is not investment. Speculators have to expect to get burned from time to time.
I don't think that the loan products are the culprits, so much as the underwriting standards. Obvious speculators should have to have a little "skin in the game" while an owner occupier should be able to purchase without any money of their own.
Jim,
A great post.
That was a market we still have to pay for. The correction is here for me in San Diego and I think will loom for a couple more years it's already been going on for 2. When the bottom is found things will normalize. They did get crazy - now the mess needs to be cleaned up. I'm not a fan of big-brother but I do think that government needs to have stricter guidelines on lending. Otherwise this will cycle up again. Jim, fantastic insight into a problem we are all facing or are going to face soon.
Mike Lewis
Jim
I like these posts as they have a sense of realism.
We are seeing the same problems here in the UK. Historically we have always had a "boom" followed by "bust" in the housing market (30 year fixed rate loans are not the norm here) but the "bust" has usually been masked by inflation so nominal price adjustments have been rare.
Inflation is currently low and employment high, yet repossessions are set to rise due to a combination of bad lending practices and fallout from the re-packaged US sub-prime "investments" as banks are having to write off losses on these financial instruments resulting in an unwillingness to lend to other banks.
I am hoping that the government keep there fingers out of this particular pie as they will only make it worse if they try to intervene.
Over time the market will self-correct and a return to cautious lending is no bad thing.
Jim,
Here is how I look at it...when someone gets qualified for a loan with no money down but can't pay their little cell phone bill then something is wrong. When someone can buy a property and then turn around and sell it quick with a large profit then something is wrong. Not because it is wrong but because if it is that easy then everyone would be doing it and they were. Now with people getting stuck carrying homes they certainly should not have owned...something is wrong. It was nice while it lasted but because of this new method...the hammer has fell on those who didn't make it out alive. It is not normal...people think there is something wrong. Its not wrong...it is just what it should be. No traditional loans with money down killed out market.
I'm so glad my boys are old enough to experience the current market (through me and my real estate ramblings at the dinner table) so that they will be able to make better decisions as adults when the time comes to buy their own homes.
I find it especially funny to watch all those flipping shows on TV...clearly they aren't in my market...yet there are people in my market who think if they buy a house and fix it up they'll make $70,000 in only 6 weeks! Imagine that!!
Jim, I acknowledge your stats. but the NOOs are split into two main groups: investors (buy and hold) and speculators (flippers). How do we determine the per centage of flippers? These are the guys who de-stabilize thye market. If I was a lender (and I am) I would not make a loan to a flipper on principle.
Bill Roberts